Unsupervised Extraction of Syntactic Patterns for Identifying Lexical Opposition Relations in Spanish
Abstract
Lexical resources are difficult, costly and time-consuming to produce and maintain. In this paper, we propose a methodology for the automatic extraction of lexical opposition relations, in particular antonyms and co-hyponyms, by means of juxtaposed syntactic patterns, in order to contribute to the construction and expansion of lexical resources. Using an extensive Spanish text corpus, specific rules and textual analysis tools developed in Python, a methodology based on three modules was implemented: (1) extraction of repetition patterns, (2) filtering of co-hyponyms by symmetry, and (3) binarization of multiple candidate pairs of antonyms. The system showed a high level of precision in classifying cohyponyms and antonyms, according to an evaluation based on human annotations. The results demonstrate that the methodology is able to identify oppositional lexical relations efficiently, without relying on external linguistic resources, which can contribute to the automated enrichment and maintenance of lexical resources.
Copyright (c) 2025 Alejandro Pimentel-Alarcón, Gerardo Sierra, Alexander Gelbukh, Alec Sánchez-Montero

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).








